By Tom Whitehead, Telegraph
A quarter of the population will be aged 65 or over within 25 years raising fresh fears of an ageing time bomb.
Those aged 85 or over are alone expected to double to 3.3 million by 2033 to make up one in 20 of the country.
At the same time the proportion of people of working age is expected to fall meaning an increasing individual financial burden to support the elderly.
The Government is already planning to raise the state pension age from 65 in steps to 68 in bid to ease a black hole that could run in to billions of pounds.
Projections by the Office for National Statistics warn the number of people aged 65 or over is expected to increase by 6.5 million to 16.4 million by 2033, at which point they would make up 23 per cent of the population.
The number of "very old people" of 85 or over has already doubled from 0.6 million in 1983 to 1.3 million by 2008 and is expected to double again over the next 25 years.
At the same time, the proportion of the population aged between 16 and 64 is expected to fall from 65 per cent to 59 per cent.
From An Exercise in the Fundamentals of Orthodoxy
This short broadcast can be viewed here.
The Revd Peter Ould points out 'that I had no editorial control over what was eventually broadcast, so there was plenty of stuff that I talked about that didn’t make the final cut and also what you saw was not necessarily filmed in the same order.'
By Dale O'Leary, LifeSite News
The debate over therapy for same-sex attraction (SSA) and gender identity disorder (GID) has been going on for years. Recently, the APA put out a paper designed to resolve the issue. However, the introduction of the APA’s Task Force Report on Appropriate Therapeutic Responses to Sexual Orientation defines the parameters for the discussion in such a way that the defenders of therapy for SSA and GID are positioned in the worst possible light. The issue is essentially decided in favor of gay-affirming therapy before the evidence is heard.
According to the introduction of the paper: “We see this multiculturally competent and affirmative approach as grounded in an acceptance of the following scientific facts.” This is followed by five supposedly scientific facts that are presented for acceptance as the foundation for discussion. However, the five points are not universally accepted facts based on uncontroverted scientific evidence, but biased statements that obscure the facts. Here are the five so-called facts and the concerns they raise. 1) Same-sex sexual attractions, behavior, and orientations per se are normal and positive variants of human sexuality—in other words, they do not indicate either mental or developmental disorders. Read more hereFrom AFA
WHY WAS THE 20th CENTURY SO BLOODY?
There have always been mad-men, but the 20th century was the bloodiest century in human history. Why? What changed? Why did the world suddenly find itself murdering millions of innocent people?
Is it possible that one specific idea influenced or provided a justification for the atrocities we know as Nazi Germany, the eugenics movement and abortion?
Is it possible that idea was Darwinian evolution?
Charles Darwin loved his wife and children. He paid his taxes and he never kicked his dog. But Charles Darwin had a big idea, and ideas have consequences.
Can we thank the advocates of natural selection for the deaths of millions of people? Or were their ideas twisted and misapplied? Dr. John West, Dr. Richard Weikart and Dr. David Berlinski present the evidence that seeks to resolve the question,
“What hath Darwin wrought?”
By Howard Mintz, Mercury News
A San Francisco federal judge today struck down California's ban on same-sex marriage, concluding that it tramples on the equal rights of gay and lesbian couples and setting the stage for an appeal that appears destined for the U.S. Supreme Court.
In a 136-page ruling, Chief U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker sided with two same-sex couples that challenged voter-approved Proposition 8, which embedded a ban on gay marriage in the California constitution and wiped out a prior California Supreme Court ruling that briefly legalized same-sex nuptials across the state. Walker ordered that Proposition 8 should be immediately voided, and same-sex couples be given the chance marry across California.
Prop. 8 defenders have already vowed to ask an appeals court to immediately stay Walker's order.
With demonstrations and vigils at the ready in San Francisco and elsewhere, the judge based his decision on an unprecedented trial held in January, a crucial turn in the first federal court test in the nation of a state law forbidding same-sex marriage. Walker's decision is expected to be appealed swiftly to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, and defenders of Prop. 8 moved even before the ruling to seek a stay that would preserve the status quo to prevent gay and lesbian couples from marrying while the legal battle continues to unfold.